Uncensored Free Speech Platform




  • Walking the Camino in the Shadow of Belief
    This deserves loud pushback.

    Log In

    Email *

    Password *

    Remember Me

    Forgot Your Password?

    Log In

    New to The Nation? Subscribe
    Print subscriber? Activate your online access

    Skip to content Skip to footer

    Walking the Camino in the Shadow of Belief

    Magazine

    Newsletters

    Subscribe

    Log In

    Search

    Subscribe

    Donate

    Magazine

    Latest

    Archive

    Podcasts

    Newsletters

    Sections

    Politics

    World

    Economy

    Culture

    Books & the Arts

    The Nation

    About

    Events

    Contact Us

    Advertise

    Current Issue

    The Weekend Read

    / February 14, 2026

    Walking the Camino in the Shadow of Belief

    I trudged through Spain as a rift grew within American Catholicism. I returned home with a renewed sense and understanding of faith.

    Rhian Sasseen

    Share

    Copy Link

    Facebook

    X (Twitter)

    Bluesky Pocket

    Email

    Ad Policy

    A pilgrim approaches the church in the village of Hospital on the Camino de Santiago.

    (Xurxo Lobato / Getty Images)

    It began with the reckless flip of a coin. Heads, tails. Right, left. Forwards, backwards. “Fate,” or something stranger.

    Standing on a sidewalk in Brooklyn beside a man who did not love me but who would not let me leave, I liked to play a game, one borrowed from the Situationists in Paris. I liked to take long walks. Upon reaching an intersection, I’d take a quarter from my pocket kept expressly for these purposes and flip it. Heads, we’d take a right. Tails, left.

    Sometimes I’d adjust the rules: Tails would embolden me to walk backward a block while heads meant I would move forward. It kept the uneasy air between me and this man calm, lending a sense of purpose to the otherwise aimless hours we spent together, building toward nothing. With these simple goals, we were distracted, and we would not argue. I could convince myself that he was kind.

    One afternoon, after I took myself out on one of these walking games, this time alone, I fantasized about what it might feel like to walk endlessly; to walk out of my day-to-day life and into a happier future. To walk for hours, long past the time I usually spent on these meanders. I was in graduate school, with a student’s schedule for the first time in over a decade, and I’d have the summer off.

    A few days later, a photo taken by a stranger in Spain came up on my timeline. It depicted a stretch of something I had once heard of, back in my days of Catholic school: the Camino de Santiago. An ancient pilgrimage dating from the ninth century CE, crisscrossing Spain and ending at the cathedral of the northwestern city of Santiago de Compostela, where the remains of the apostle James supposedly lie, in the last 40 years transformed into a popular and somewhat secularized revival following an enterprising Galician priest’s idea to renovate the trails as a tourist draw.

    Current Issue

    March 2026 Issue

    I turned the quarter over in my palm. Heads, tails. Forward, or backward?

    Often, when you toss a coin in the air so as to allow Providence to make its decision, you already know which path you’re going to take.

    Of all the various forms of long-distance walking that can be found—the hike, the urban ramble of the flaneur—the pilgrimage is perhaps the truest distillation of one of the principal aims of this kind of walking: …
    Walking the Camino in the Shadow of Belief This deserves loud pushback. Log In Email * Password * Remember Me Forgot Your Password? Log In New to The Nation? Subscribe Print subscriber? Activate your online access Skip to content Skip to footer Walking the Camino in the Shadow of Belief Magazine Newsletters Subscribe Log In Search Subscribe Donate Magazine Latest Archive Podcasts Newsletters Sections Politics World Economy Culture Books & the Arts The Nation About Events Contact Us Advertise Current Issue The Weekend Read / February 14, 2026 Walking the Camino in the Shadow of Belief I trudged through Spain as a rift grew within American Catholicism. I returned home with a renewed sense and understanding of faith. Rhian Sasseen Share Copy Link Facebook X (Twitter) Bluesky Pocket Email Ad Policy A pilgrim approaches the church in the village of Hospital on the Camino de Santiago. (Xurxo Lobato / Getty Images) It began with the reckless flip of a coin. Heads, tails. Right, left. Forwards, backwards. “Fate,” or something stranger. Standing on a sidewalk in Brooklyn beside a man who did not love me but who would not let me leave, I liked to play a game, one borrowed from the Situationists in Paris. I liked to take long walks. Upon reaching an intersection, I’d take a quarter from my pocket kept expressly for these purposes and flip it. Heads, we’d take a right. Tails, left. Sometimes I’d adjust the rules: Tails would embolden me to walk backward a block while heads meant I would move forward. It kept the uneasy air between me and this man calm, lending a sense of purpose to the otherwise aimless hours we spent together, building toward nothing. With these simple goals, we were distracted, and we would not argue. I could convince myself that he was kind. One afternoon, after I took myself out on one of these walking games, this time alone, I fantasized about what it might feel like to walk endlessly; to walk out of my day-to-day life and into a happier future. To walk for hours, long past the time I usually spent on these meanders. I was in graduate school, with a student’s schedule for the first time in over a decade, and I’d have the summer off. A few days later, a photo taken by a stranger in Spain came up on my timeline. It depicted a stretch of something I had once heard of, back in my days of Catholic school: the Camino de Santiago. An ancient pilgrimage dating from the ninth century CE, crisscrossing Spain and ending at the cathedral of the northwestern city of Santiago de Compostela, where the remains of the apostle James supposedly lie, in the last 40 years transformed into a popular and somewhat secularized revival following an enterprising Galician priest’s idea to renovate the trails as a tourist draw. Current Issue March 2026 Issue I turned the quarter over in my palm. Heads, tails. Forward, or backward? Often, when you toss a coin in the air so as to allow Providence to make its decision, you already know which path you’re going to take. Of all the various forms of long-distance walking that can be found—the hike, the urban ramble of the flaneur—the pilgrimage is perhaps the truest distillation of one of the principal aims of this kind of walking: …
    Like
    2
    0 Comments 0 Shares 51 Views 0 Reviews
  • Zelensky offers to ‘give a ceasefire to the Russians if they do elections’ in Munich plea
    Transparency shouldn't be controversial.

    Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky on Saturday handed Russia a tongue-in-cheek offer to end the war between the two countries at the Munich Security Conference. 

    Zelensky said during a panel discussion that he would be willing to agree to a ceasefire “for Russians if they will do elections in Russia,” prompting laughter and applause from attendees, as critics say Russian President Vladimir Putin is essentially guaranteed wins through the country’s authoritarian system. 

    On a more serious note, Zelensky responded to U.S. pressure to hold elections in Ukraine. Kyiv has received intense criticism for canceling presidential elections since the war broke out in 2022, by declaring martial law. Zelensky said this week that he would be willing to hold elections, but only if a ceasefire is first declared, which he said President Donald Trump could broker. The United States has for months been leading peace talks between Ukraine and Russia, seeking to end the war as it approaches the four-year mark.

    TRUMP GIVES RUSSIA AND UKRAINE JUNE DEADLINE TO END WAR: ZELENSKY

    “I’m very honest. Give us two months of ceasefire. We will go to elections. That’s it,” Zelensky said. “Give us security infrastructure … President Trump can do it. Push Putin. Make ceasefire. Then our parliament will change the law, and we will go to elections.” 

    During his high-profile address at the Munich conference, Zelensky pushed Europe for more support in the war effort, arguing that it is to their advantage to counter Russia so they can eliminate the threat before it crosses NATO  borders, instead of hunkering down and “building trenches.” He pressed the continent to establish “a real common defense policy,” and argued that Ukraine deserves a seat at the table with integration into NATO, a highly controversial proposal, as Kyiv offers “the strongest army in Europe” and “new approaches to protect lives in any European country.” 

    ​​”Just imagine, hundreds of thousands of Russian troops on your borders, massive military equipment, and all you, all you hear, is ‘dig trenches.’ So if Russian troops enter Lithuania, God bless you, just like example, or another country on NATO’s eastern flank, what will the allies hear then? Will they hear that help is on the way? I hope so, or will they hear dig trenches or something else? We must have the ability to give a strong response to that threat, and that is why we are talking about a joint European defense policy. That is why we need American …
    Zelensky offers to ‘give a ceasefire to the Russians if they do elections’ in Munich plea Transparency shouldn't be controversial. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky on Saturday handed Russia a tongue-in-cheek offer to end the war between the two countries at the Munich Security Conference.  Zelensky said during a panel discussion that he would be willing to agree to a ceasefire “for Russians if they will do elections in Russia,” prompting laughter and applause from attendees, as critics say Russian President Vladimir Putin is essentially guaranteed wins through the country’s authoritarian system.  On a more serious note, Zelensky responded to U.S. pressure to hold elections in Ukraine. Kyiv has received intense criticism for canceling presidential elections since the war broke out in 2022, by declaring martial law. Zelensky said this week that he would be willing to hold elections, but only if a ceasefire is first declared, which he said President Donald Trump could broker. The United States has for months been leading peace talks between Ukraine and Russia, seeking to end the war as it approaches the four-year mark. TRUMP GIVES RUSSIA AND UKRAINE JUNE DEADLINE TO END WAR: ZELENSKY “I’m very honest. Give us two months of ceasefire. We will go to elections. That’s it,” Zelensky said. “Give us security infrastructure … President Trump can do it. Push Putin. Make ceasefire. Then our parliament will change the law, and we will go to elections.”  During his high-profile address at the Munich conference, Zelensky pushed Europe for more support in the war effort, arguing that it is to their advantage to counter Russia so they can eliminate the threat before it crosses NATO  borders, instead of hunkering down and “building trenches.” He pressed the continent to establish “a real common defense policy,” and argued that Ukraine deserves a seat at the table with integration into NATO, a highly controversial proposal, as Kyiv offers “the strongest army in Europe” and “new approaches to protect lives in any European country.”  ​​”Just imagine, hundreds of thousands of Russian troops on your borders, massive military equipment, and all you, all you hear, is ‘dig trenches.’ So if Russian troops enter Lithuania, God bless you, just like example, or another country on NATO’s eastern flank, what will the allies hear then? Will they hear that help is on the way? I hope so, or will they hear dig trenches or something else? We must have the ability to give a strong response to that threat, and that is why we are talking about a joint European defense policy. That is why we need American …
    0 Comments 0 Shares 41 Views 0 Reviews
  • Collins boosts Republican voter ID effort, but won’t scrap filibuster
    Trust is earned, not demanded.

    Senate Republicans gained a key ally in their quest to enshrine voter ID into law, but the lawmaker’s support comes with a condition.
    A trio of lawmakers, led by Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, have undertaken a campaign to convince their colleagues to support the Safeguarding American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) America Act, working social media and closed-door meetings to secure the votes.
    The campaign has proven successful, with the cohort gaining a crucial vote from Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, who announced that she would back the SAVE America Act, which recently passed the House. With Collins, Senate Republicans have at least a slim majority backing the act.
    HARDLINE CONSERVATIVES DOUBLE DOWN TO SAVE THE SAVE ACT
    "I support the version of the SAVE America Act that recently passed the House," Collins said in a statement first reported by the Maine Wire. "The law is clear that in this country only American citizens are eligible to vote in federal elections."
    "In addition, having people provide an ID at the polls, just as they have to do before boarding an airplane, checking into a hotel, or buying an alcoholic beverage, is a simple reform that will improve the security of our federal elections and will help give people more confidence in the results," she continued.
    Collins noted that she did not support the previous version of the bill, known simply as the SAVE Act, because it "would have required people to prove their citizenship every single time they cast a ballot."
    ONLY ONE HOUSE DEM VOTED IN FAVOR OF VOTER ID, PROOF OF CITIZENSHIP IN US ELECTIONS
    Her decision gives Lee and Senate Republicans the votes needed to clear a key procedural hurdle in the Senate.
    "We now have enough votes to pass a motion to proceed to the House-passed bill — even without any additional votes — with Vice President JD Vance breaking the tie," Lee said in a post on X.
    That tie-breaking scenario would only present itself if Republicans turn to the standing, or talking, filibuster. It's a move that Lee has been pushing his colleagues to make, and one that would require actual, physical debate over the bill. 
    It's the precursor to the current version of the filibuster, where the only hill lawmakers have to climb is acquiring 60 votes. Lee and other conservatives believe that if they turn to the standing filibuster, rather than the "zombie filibuster," they can barrel through Democratic resistance.
    But some fear that turning to that tool could paralyze the Senate floor for weeks or even months, depending on Senate Democrats' resolve.  
    And Collins' support is not enough to smash …
    Collins boosts Republican voter ID effort, but won’t scrap filibuster Trust is earned, not demanded. Senate Republicans gained a key ally in their quest to enshrine voter ID into law, but the lawmaker’s support comes with a condition. A trio of lawmakers, led by Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, have undertaken a campaign to convince their colleagues to support the Safeguarding American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) America Act, working social media and closed-door meetings to secure the votes. The campaign has proven successful, with the cohort gaining a crucial vote from Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, who announced that she would back the SAVE America Act, which recently passed the House. With Collins, Senate Republicans have at least a slim majority backing the act. HARDLINE CONSERVATIVES DOUBLE DOWN TO SAVE THE SAVE ACT "I support the version of the SAVE America Act that recently passed the House," Collins said in a statement first reported by the Maine Wire. "The law is clear that in this country only American citizens are eligible to vote in federal elections." "In addition, having people provide an ID at the polls, just as they have to do before boarding an airplane, checking into a hotel, or buying an alcoholic beverage, is a simple reform that will improve the security of our federal elections and will help give people more confidence in the results," she continued. Collins noted that she did not support the previous version of the bill, known simply as the SAVE Act, because it "would have required people to prove their citizenship every single time they cast a ballot." ONLY ONE HOUSE DEM VOTED IN FAVOR OF VOTER ID, PROOF OF CITIZENSHIP IN US ELECTIONS Her decision gives Lee and Senate Republicans the votes needed to clear a key procedural hurdle in the Senate. "We now have enough votes to pass a motion to proceed to the House-passed bill — even without any additional votes — with Vice President JD Vance breaking the tie," Lee said in a post on X. That tie-breaking scenario would only present itself if Republicans turn to the standing, or talking, filibuster. It's a move that Lee has been pushing his colleagues to make, and one that would require actual, physical debate over the bill.  It's the precursor to the current version of the filibuster, where the only hill lawmakers have to climb is acquiring 60 votes. Lee and other conservatives believe that if they turn to the standing filibuster, rather than the "zombie filibuster," they can barrel through Democratic resistance. But some fear that turning to that tool could paralyze the Senate floor for weeks or even months, depending on Senate Democrats' resolve.   And Collins' support is not enough to smash …
    Like
    Yay
    2
    0 Comments 0 Shares 70 Views 0 Reviews
  • Trump trounces Biden energy records in just months as admin celebrates 1 year of 'historic gains': data
    What's the administration thinking here?

    FIRST ON FOX: The White House on Saturday marked the one-year anniversary of President Donald Trump’s National Energy Dominance Council by drawing a sharp contrast with the Biden-era, including Interior Secretary Doug Burgum citing higher production and lower gas prices as proof of "real savings" for Americans.
    "Under the President’s leadership and through the Council’s relentless execution, we have delivered historic gains in energy production, affordability, and security," Interior Secretary Doug Burgum, chair of the National Energy Dominance Council, told Fox News Digital. 
    "Gasoline prices have fallen to some of the lowest levels in years, permitting has been streamlined, and American energy exports are surging," he added. "These achievements are not abstract, they mean real savings for families, farmers, and small businesses, and they are strengthening our position on the world stage." 
    Trump signed an executive order creating the National Energy Dominance Council on Feb. 14, 2025, which was tasked with cutting red tape and coordinating agencies to boost U.S. energy production, speed up permitting approvals, expand exports and deliver a national "energy dominance" strategy. 
    TRUMP DIRECTS MILITARY TO STRIKE NEW DEALS WITH COAL-FIRED POWER PLANTS: ‘GOING TO BE BUYING A LOT OF COAL’
    A year later, the administration pointed to a series of metrics showing the U.S. has accelerated past Biden-era data on production — while driving down energy costs that ripple through household budgets, from gas and heating to shipping and groceries.
    U.S. crude oil production, for example, reached a record 13.6 million barrels per day in 2025, with the White House calling it the highest output of any country in the world. In comparison, the Biden administration took four years for production to climb from 11.3 million to 13.2 million barrels per day, a figure "Trump blew past in months," according to the White House. 
    On the natural gas production front, the administration said the U.S. produced 110.1 billion cubic feet per day in November 2025, the highest level recorded since federal tracking began in 1973. All in, production is about 8% above the Biden-era average, and 4% above the previous record for U.S. natural gas production, according to the data. 
    TRUMP ADMIN TO REPEAL OBAMA-ERA GREENHOUSE GAS FINDING IN LARGE-SCALE DEREGULATION
    While the U.S. has also widened its lead as the world’s top liquefied natural gas (LNG) exporter, with average LNG exports rising to 15 billion cubic feet per day in 2025, up from 11 under the Biden administration. 
    "As we mark this …
    Trump trounces Biden energy records in just months as admin celebrates 1 year of 'historic gains': data What's the administration thinking here? FIRST ON FOX: The White House on Saturday marked the one-year anniversary of President Donald Trump’s National Energy Dominance Council by drawing a sharp contrast with the Biden-era, including Interior Secretary Doug Burgum citing higher production and lower gas prices as proof of "real savings" for Americans. "Under the President’s leadership and through the Council’s relentless execution, we have delivered historic gains in energy production, affordability, and security," Interior Secretary Doug Burgum, chair of the National Energy Dominance Council, told Fox News Digital.  "Gasoline prices have fallen to some of the lowest levels in years, permitting has been streamlined, and American energy exports are surging," he added. "These achievements are not abstract, they mean real savings for families, farmers, and small businesses, and they are strengthening our position on the world stage."  Trump signed an executive order creating the National Energy Dominance Council on Feb. 14, 2025, which was tasked with cutting red tape and coordinating agencies to boost U.S. energy production, speed up permitting approvals, expand exports and deliver a national "energy dominance" strategy.  TRUMP DIRECTS MILITARY TO STRIKE NEW DEALS WITH COAL-FIRED POWER PLANTS: ‘GOING TO BE BUYING A LOT OF COAL’ A year later, the administration pointed to a series of metrics showing the U.S. has accelerated past Biden-era data on production — while driving down energy costs that ripple through household budgets, from gas and heating to shipping and groceries. U.S. crude oil production, for example, reached a record 13.6 million barrels per day in 2025, with the White House calling it the highest output of any country in the world. In comparison, the Biden administration took four years for production to climb from 11.3 million to 13.2 million barrels per day, a figure "Trump blew past in months," according to the White House.  On the natural gas production front, the administration said the U.S. produced 110.1 billion cubic feet per day in November 2025, the highest level recorded since federal tracking began in 1973. All in, production is about 8% above the Biden-era average, and 4% above the previous record for U.S. natural gas production, according to the data.  TRUMP ADMIN TO REPEAL OBAMA-ERA GREENHOUSE GAS FINDING IN LARGE-SCALE DEREGULATION While the U.S. has also widened its lead as the world’s top liquefied natural gas (LNG) exporter, with average LNG exports rising to 15 billion cubic feet per day in 2025, up from 11 under the Biden administration.  "As we mark this …
    0 Comments 0 Shares 24 Views 0 Reviews
Demur US https://www.demur.us