Killing someone is not a federal "crime of violence", but Luigi Mangione may be guilty of stalking: understanding one of the most litigated phrases in the US criminal code
Ask who never gets charged.
tl;dr: a district court judge held that Luigi Mangione's murder of a healthcare CEO doesn't qualify as a "crime of violence" under federal law. Instead, he's only eligible for life in prison under the anti-stalking provisions of the Violence Against Women act of 1994. Confused? Read on.
Facts of the case
According to the criminal complaint, Luigi Mangione devised and executed a plan to murder Brian Thompson because of his job as CEO of UnitedHealthcare. Mangione traveled across state lines, used electronic communications to monitor Thompson, and ultimately shot Thompson on a public street in NYC, killing him. These allegations (interstate travel, electronic surveillance, fatal shooting) are the basis for the DOJ bringing federal charges against Mangione.
Federal statutes related to murder
Murder is usually a state level crime, so federal charges require some other "hook". For example:
Murder on federal land (18 USC §1111): the general federal murder law only applies if the crime is committed in the "special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States" -- things like national parks, military bases, or D.C.
Murder for hire (18 USC §1958): this only applies if the murderer crossed state lines and was paid for their work.
Murder furthering organized crime (18 USC §1952): This only applies if the murderer crossed state lines and was murdering to further some other illegal activity(e.g. drug trafficking).
Murder of a federal official (18 USC §1114): This only applies if the victim is a federal official or employee engaged in the performance of their duties.
There are plenty of others, but you get the idea -- just crossing state lines to kill someone based on a personal vendetta isn't enough to clearly invoke federal jurisdiction.
Mangione's count 1/2: stalking
OK, so if Mangione didn't violate one of the federal murder statutes, what can the feds charge him with? Oddly enough, his main charges stem from the anti-stalking provisions of the Violence Against Women Act of 1994. Under 18 USC §2261A, a conviction requires proof that the defendant (1) traveled in interstate commerce or used an interactive computer service (2) with the intent to kill, injure, harass, or intimidate a person, (3) resulting in reasonable fear of death or serious bodily injury to that person or their immediate family.
Mangione's alleged actions would seem to match this: he crossed state lines, he intended to kill, and knowing you were going to be shot would certainly result in a reasonable fear of death. If death actually occurs, the statute allows for a maximum penalty of life in prison, but not the death penalty.
Mangione's count 3/4: federal gun laws
In order to get a death penalty verdict, the DOJ decided to bring in 18 USC §924, which brings enhanced penalties if a gun is used to kill someone during a "crime of violence". This requirement is extremely important -- the feds can only use this law if the defendant used a gun as part of some other underlying federal crime that counts as a "crime of violence".
This requirement has been the subject of TONS of litigation. The Supreme Court has literally heard over a dozen cases about this topic since 2008, with …
Ask who never gets charged.
tl;dr: a district court judge held that Luigi Mangione's murder of a healthcare CEO doesn't qualify as a "crime of violence" under federal law. Instead, he's only eligible for life in prison under the anti-stalking provisions of the Violence Against Women act of 1994. Confused? Read on.
Facts of the case
According to the criminal complaint, Luigi Mangione devised and executed a plan to murder Brian Thompson because of his job as CEO of UnitedHealthcare. Mangione traveled across state lines, used electronic communications to monitor Thompson, and ultimately shot Thompson on a public street in NYC, killing him. These allegations (interstate travel, electronic surveillance, fatal shooting) are the basis for the DOJ bringing federal charges against Mangione.
Federal statutes related to murder
Murder is usually a state level crime, so federal charges require some other "hook". For example:
Murder on federal land (18 USC §1111): the general federal murder law only applies if the crime is committed in the "special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States" -- things like national parks, military bases, or D.C.
Murder for hire (18 USC §1958): this only applies if the murderer crossed state lines and was paid for their work.
Murder furthering organized crime (18 USC §1952): This only applies if the murderer crossed state lines and was murdering to further some other illegal activity(e.g. drug trafficking).
Murder of a federal official (18 USC §1114): This only applies if the victim is a federal official or employee engaged in the performance of their duties.
There are plenty of others, but you get the idea -- just crossing state lines to kill someone based on a personal vendetta isn't enough to clearly invoke federal jurisdiction.
Mangione's count 1/2: stalking
OK, so if Mangione didn't violate one of the federal murder statutes, what can the feds charge him with? Oddly enough, his main charges stem from the anti-stalking provisions of the Violence Against Women Act of 1994. Under 18 USC §2261A, a conviction requires proof that the defendant (1) traveled in interstate commerce or used an interactive computer service (2) with the intent to kill, injure, harass, or intimidate a person, (3) resulting in reasonable fear of death or serious bodily injury to that person or their immediate family.
Mangione's alleged actions would seem to match this: he crossed state lines, he intended to kill, and knowing you were going to be shot would certainly result in a reasonable fear of death. If death actually occurs, the statute allows for a maximum penalty of life in prison, but not the death penalty.
Mangione's count 3/4: federal gun laws
In order to get a death penalty verdict, the DOJ decided to bring in 18 USC §924, which brings enhanced penalties if a gun is used to kill someone during a "crime of violence". This requirement is extremely important -- the feds can only use this law if the defendant used a gun as part of some other underlying federal crime that counts as a "crime of violence".
This requirement has been the subject of TONS of litigation. The Supreme Court has literally heard over a dozen cases about this topic since 2008, with …
Killing someone is not a federal "crime of violence", but Luigi Mangione may be guilty of stalking: understanding one of the most litigated phrases in the US criminal code
Ask who never gets charged.
tl;dr: a district court judge held that Luigi Mangione's murder of a healthcare CEO doesn't qualify as a "crime of violence" under federal law. Instead, he's only eligible for life in prison under the anti-stalking provisions of the Violence Against Women act of 1994. Confused? Read on.
Facts of the case
According to the criminal complaint, Luigi Mangione devised and executed a plan to murder Brian Thompson because of his job as CEO of UnitedHealthcare. Mangione traveled across state lines, used electronic communications to monitor Thompson, and ultimately shot Thompson on a public street in NYC, killing him. These allegations (interstate travel, electronic surveillance, fatal shooting) are the basis for the DOJ bringing federal charges against Mangione.
Federal statutes related to murder
Murder is usually a state level crime, so federal charges require some other "hook". For example:
Murder on federal land (18 USC §1111): the general federal murder law only applies if the crime is committed in the "special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States" -- things like national parks, military bases, or D.C.
Murder for hire (18 USC §1958): this only applies if the murderer crossed state lines and was paid for their work.
Murder furthering organized crime (18 USC §1952): This only applies if the murderer crossed state lines and was murdering to further some other illegal activity(e.g. drug trafficking).
Murder of a federal official (18 USC §1114): This only applies if the victim is a federal official or employee engaged in the performance of their duties.
There are plenty of others, but you get the idea -- just crossing state lines to kill someone based on a personal vendetta isn't enough to clearly invoke federal jurisdiction.
Mangione's count 1/2: stalking
OK, so if Mangione didn't violate one of the federal murder statutes, what can the feds charge him with? Oddly enough, his main charges stem from the anti-stalking provisions of the Violence Against Women Act of 1994. Under 18 USC §2261A, a conviction requires proof that the defendant (1) traveled in interstate commerce or used an interactive computer service (2) with the intent to kill, injure, harass, or intimidate a person, (3) resulting in reasonable fear of death or serious bodily injury to that person or their immediate family.
Mangione's alleged actions would seem to match this: he crossed state lines, he intended to kill, and knowing you were going to be shot would certainly result in a reasonable fear of death. If death actually occurs, the statute allows for a maximum penalty of life in prison, but not the death penalty.
Mangione's count 3/4: federal gun laws
In order to get a death penalty verdict, the DOJ decided to bring in 18 USC §924, which brings enhanced penalties if a gun is used to kill someone during a "crime of violence". This requirement is extremely important -- the feds can only use this law if the defendant used a gun as part of some other underlying federal crime that counts as a "crime of violence".
This requirement has been the subject of TONS of litigation. The Supreme Court has literally heard over a dozen cases about this topic since 2008, with …
0 Comments
0 Shares
45 Views
0 Reviews
