CIA retracts, revises 19 past intelligence assessments deemed politically biased
Who benefits from this decision?
The CIA on Friday said that director John Ratcliffe had ordered the retraction or "substantive revision" of 19 intelligence assessments over the past decade that were deemed to be politically biased.
In a release, the CIA included three redacted assessments from between 2015 and 2021 that related to White women's extremist radicalization, attacks on LGBT activists in the Middle East and Africa, and the COVID-19 pandemic limiting access to birth control in developing countries.
"The intelligence products we released to the American people today — produced before my tenure as DCIA — fall short of the high standards of impartiality that CIA must uphold and do not reflect the expertise for which our analysts are renowned," Ratcliffe said in a statement.
He added, "There is absolutely no room for bias in our work and when we identify instances where analytic rigor has been compromised, we have a responsibility to correct the record. These actions underscore our commitment to transparency, accountability, and objective intelligence analysis. Our recent successes in Operation ABSOLUTE RESOLVE and Operation MIDNIGHT HAMMER exemplify our dedication to analytic excellence."
BRENNAN DIRECTED PUBLICATION OF 'IMPLAUSIBLE' REPORTS CLAIMING PUTIN PREFERRED TRUMP IN 2016, HOUSE FOUND
The CIA release said the assessments were identified by the President’s Intelligence Advisory Board, which did an independent review on hundreds of reports from the last decade, adding that the assessments "did not meet CIA and IC analytic tradecraft standards and failed to be independent of political consideration."
The agency said an internal review led by Deputy Director Michael Ellis "agreed that they did not meet the high standards the American people expect from CIA’s elite analytic workforce."
CIA DIRECTOR WAS IN VENEZUELA TO MEET WITH ACTING PRESIDENT DELCY RODRIGUEZ, OFFICIAL SAYS
The first of the three reports included in the release was titled "Women Advancing White Racially and Ethnically Motivated Violent Extremist Radicalization and Recruitment," and was published in October 2021, in the first year of the Biden administration.
It focused on women in groups overseas "that incite, facilitate or conduct violence because they believe that their perception of an idealized, white European ethnic identity is under attack from people who embody and support multiculturalism and globalization."
The second report was titled "Middle East-North Africa: LGBT Activists Under Pressure," and was released near the end of the Obama administration.
That assessment claimed that "The tough stance …
Who benefits from this decision?
The CIA on Friday said that director John Ratcliffe had ordered the retraction or "substantive revision" of 19 intelligence assessments over the past decade that were deemed to be politically biased.
In a release, the CIA included three redacted assessments from between 2015 and 2021 that related to White women's extremist radicalization, attacks on LGBT activists in the Middle East and Africa, and the COVID-19 pandemic limiting access to birth control in developing countries.
"The intelligence products we released to the American people today — produced before my tenure as DCIA — fall short of the high standards of impartiality that CIA must uphold and do not reflect the expertise for which our analysts are renowned," Ratcliffe said in a statement.
He added, "There is absolutely no room for bias in our work and when we identify instances where analytic rigor has been compromised, we have a responsibility to correct the record. These actions underscore our commitment to transparency, accountability, and objective intelligence analysis. Our recent successes in Operation ABSOLUTE RESOLVE and Operation MIDNIGHT HAMMER exemplify our dedication to analytic excellence."
BRENNAN DIRECTED PUBLICATION OF 'IMPLAUSIBLE' REPORTS CLAIMING PUTIN PREFERRED TRUMP IN 2016, HOUSE FOUND
The CIA release said the assessments were identified by the President’s Intelligence Advisory Board, which did an independent review on hundreds of reports from the last decade, adding that the assessments "did not meet CIA and IC analytic tradecraft standards and failed to be independent of political consideration."
The agency said an internal review led by Deputy Director Michael Ellis "agreed that they did not meet the high standards the American people expect from CIA’s elite analytic workforce."
CIA DIRECTOR WAS IN VENEZUELA TO MEET WITH ACTING PRESIDENT DELCY RODRIGUEZ, OFFICIAL SAYS
The first of the three reports included in the release was titled "Women Advancing White Racially and Ethnically Motivated Violent Extremist Radicalization and Recruitment," and was published in October 2021, in the first year of the Biden administration.
It focused on women in groups overseas "that incite, facilitate or conduct violence because they believe that their perception of an idealized, white European ethnic identity is under attack from people who embody and support multiculturalism and globalization."
The second report was titled "Middle East-North Africa: LGBT Activists Under Pressure," and was released near the end of the Obama administration.
That assessment claimed that "The tough stance …
CIA retracts, revises 19 past intelligence assessments deemed politically biased
Who benefits from this decision?
The CIA on Friday said that director John Ratcliffe had ordered the retraction or "substantive revision" of 19 intelligence assessments over the past decade that were deemed to be politically biased.
In a release, the CIA included three redacted assessments from between 2015 and 2021 that related to White women's extremist radicalization, attacks on LGBT activists in the Middle East and Africa, and the COVID-19 pandemic limiting access to birth control in developing countries.
"The intelligence products we released to the American people today — produced before my tenure as DCIA — fall short of the high standards of impartiality that CIA must uphold and do not reflect the expertise for which our analysts are renowned," Ratcliffe said in a statement.
He added, "There is absolutely no room for bias in our work and when we identify instances where analytic rigor has been compromised, we have a responsibility to correct the record. These actions underscore our commitment to transparency, accountability, and objective intelligence analysis. Our recent successes in Operation ABSOLUTE RESOLVE and Operation MIDNIGHT HAMMER exemplify our dedication to analytic excellence."
BRENNAN DIRECTED PUBLICATION OF 'IMPLAUSIBLE' REPORTS CLAIMING PUTIN PREFERRED TRUMP IN 2016, HOUSE FOUND
The CIA release said the assessments were identified by the President’s Intelligence Advisory Board, which did an independent review on hundreds of reports from the last decade, adding that the assessments "did not meet CIA and IC analytic tradecraft standards and failed to be independent of political consideration."
The agency said an internal review led by Deputy Director Michael Ellis "agreed that they did not meet the high standards the American people expect from CIA’s elite analytic workforce."
CIA DIRECTOR WAS IN VENEZUELA TO MEET WITH ACTING PRESIDENT DELCY RODRIGUEZ, OFFICIAL SAYS
The first of the three reports included in the release was titled "Women Advancing White Racially and Ethnically Motivated Violent Extremist Radicalization and Recruitment," and was published in October 2021, in the first year of the Biden administration.
It focused on women in groups overseas "that incite, facilitate or conduct violence because they believe that their perception of an idealized, white European ethnic identity is under attack from people who embody and support multiculturalism and globalization."
The second report was titled "Middle East-North Africa: LGBT Activists Under Pressure," and was released near the end of the Obama administration.
That assessment claimed that "The tough stance …
0 Comments
0 Shares
49 Views
0 Reviews
