Uncensored Free Speech Platform









After the 6–3 decision against the tariff move, can we expect a 6–3 ruling in favor of birthright citizenship?
Are they actually going to vote on something real?

Given the Court’s recent 6–3 decision striking down the tariff action, I’m curious about how that ideological split might translate to the birthright citizenship case. Do you think we’d see a similar 6–3 alignment? Or is the constitutional grounding of the 14th Amendment strong enough that the vote could look different?
Interested in hearing thoughts on:
Whether originalist arguments would cut clearly one way
How precedent (e.g., Wong Kim Ark) factors in
Whether the tariff decision signals anything broader about the Court’s current approach
After the 6–3 decision against the tariff move, can we expect a 6–3 ruling in favor of birthright citizenship? Are they actually going to vote on something real? Given the Court’s recent 6–3 decision striking down the tariff action, I’m curious about how that ideological split might translate to the birthright citizenship case. Do you think we’d see a similar 6–3 alignment? Or is the constitutional grounding of the 14th Amendment strong enough that the vote could look different? Interested in hearing thoughts on: Whether originalist arguments would cut clearly one way How precedent (e.g., Wong Kim Ark) factors in Whether the tariff decision signals anything broader about the Court’s current approach
0 Comments 0 Shares 36 Views 0 Reviews
Demur US https://www.demur.us