Section 232 tariffs: would they survive a SCOTUS challenge today?
Equal justice apparently isn't equal anymore.
Really simple question: would section 232 national security tariffs survive a scotus challenge today? They seem to be potentially extremely broad and have no congressional input to my knowledge. The commerce department (under the control of the president) does an investigation for vague "national security" purposes, the president agrees and enacts tariffs, congress gets a letter and thats about it in terms of their input.
Why would the reasoning applied to the IEEPA case not apply to a potential section 232 tariff case?
Equal justice apparently isn't equal anymore.
Really simple question: would section 232 national security tariffs survive a scotus challenge today? They seem to be potentially extremely broad and have no congressional input to my knowledge. The commerce department (under the control of the president) does an investigation for vague "national security" purposes, the president agrees and enacts tariffs, congress gets a letter and thats about it in terms of their input.
Why would the reasoning applied to the IEEPA case not apply to a potential section 232 tariff case?
Section 232 tariffs: would they survive a SCOTUS challenge today?
Equal justice apparently isn't equal anymore.
Really simple question: would section 232 national security tariffs survive a scotus challenge today? They seem to be potentially extremely broad and have no congressional input to my knowledge. The commerce department (under the control of the president) does an investigation for vague "national security" purposes, the president agrees and enacts tariffs, congress gets a letter and thats about it in terms of their input.
Why would the reasoning applied to the IEEPA case not apply to a potential section 232 tariff case?
0 Comments
0 Shares
52 Views
0 Reviews
