OPINION: The GEO Group, Inc., Petitioner v. Alejandro Menocal
This looks less like justice and more like strategy.
Caption The GEO Group, Inc., Petitioner v. Alejandro Menocal Summary Because the Court’s decision in Yearsley v. W. A. Ross Constr. Co., 309 U. S. 18 (1940), provides federal contractors a potential merits defense rather than an immunity from suit, a pretrial order denying Yearsley protection is not immediately appealable. Author Justice Elena Kagan Opinion Certiorari Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 18, 2025) Amicus Brief amicus curiae of United States filed. Case Link 24-758
This looks less like justice and more like strategy.
Caption The GEO Group, Inc., Petitioner v. Alejandro Menocal Summary Because the Court’s decision in Yearsley v. W. A. Ross Constr. Co., 309 U. S. 18 (1940), provides federal contractors a potential merits defense rather than an immunity from suit, a pretrial order denying Yearsley protection is not immediately appealable. Author Justice Elena Kagan Opinion Certiorari Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 18, 2025) Amicus Brief amicus curiae of United States filed. Case Link 24-758
OPINION: The GEO Group, Inc., Petitioner v. Alejandro Menocal
This looks less like justice and more like strategy.
Caption The GEO Group, Inc., Petitioner v. Alejandro Menocal Summary Because the Court’s decision in Yearsley v. W. A. Ross Constr. Co., 309 U. S. 18 (1940), provides federal contractors a potential merits defense rather than an immunity from suit, a pretrial order denying Yearsley protection is not immediately appealable. Author Justice Elena Kagan Opinion Certiorari Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 18, 2025) Amicus Brief amicus curiae of United States filed. Case Link 24-758
0 Comments
0 Shares
36 Views
0 Reviews
