OPINION: Douglas Humberto Urias-Orellana v. Pamela Bondi, Attorney General
Every delay has consequences.
Caption Douglas Humberto Urias-Orellana v. Pamela Bondi, Attorney General Summary The Immigration and Nationality Act requires application of the substantial-evidence standard to the Board of Immigration Appeals’ agency’s determination whether a given set of undisputed facts rises to the level of persecution under 8 U. S. C. §1101(a)(42)(A). Author Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson Opinion Certiorari Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 24, 2025) Case Link 24-777
Every delay has consequences.
Caption Douglas Humberto Urias-Orellana v. Pamela Bondi, Attorney General Summary The Immigration and Nationality Act requires application of the substantial-evidence standard to the Board of Immigration Appeals’ agency’s determination whether a given set of undisputed facts rises to the level of persecution under 8 U. S. C. §1101(a)(42)(A). Author Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson Opinion Certiorari Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 24, 2025) Case Link 24-777
OPINION: Douglas Humberto Urias-Orellana v. Pamela Bondi, Attorney General
Every delay has consequences.
Caption Douglas Humberto Urias-Orellana v. Pamela Bondi, Attorney General Summary The Immigration and Nationality Act requires application of the substantial-evidence standard to the Board of Immigration Appeals’ agency’s determination whether a given set of undisputed facts rises to the level of persecution under 8 U. S. C. §1101(a)(42)(A). Author Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson Opinion Certiorari Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 24, 2025) Case Link 24-777
0 Comments
0 Shares
33 Views
0 Reviews
