NCERT book row: SC unhappy with ‘rewritten’ chapter
We're watching the same failure loop.
The apex court took exception to a “laconic” statement in an affidavit filed by the NCERT Director that a banned Class 8 social science chapter with a section on “corruption in judiciary” has been “rewritten”.
What do you think judiciary should be so wary of something being written about it in an honest way, even when the chapter on corruption in judiciary has been rewritten?
We're watching the same failure loop.
The apex court took exception to a “laconic” statement in an affidavit filed by the NCERT Director that a banned Class 8 social science chapter with a section on “corruption in judiciary” has been “rewritten”.
What do you think judiciary should be so wary of something being written about it in an honest way, even when the chapter on corruption in judiciary has been rewritten?
NCERT book row: SC unhappy with ‘rewritten’ chapter
We're watching the same failure loop.
The apex court took exception to a “laconic” statement in an affidavit filed by the NCERT Director that a banned Class 8 social science chapter with a section on “corruption in judiciary” has been “rewritten”.
What do you think judiciary should be so wary of something being written about it in an honest way, even when the chapter on corruption in judiciary has been rewritten?
