Trump’s evolving stance on Iran ‘unconditional surrender’
Are they actually going to vote on something real?
President Donald Trump has stated repeatedly that Operation Epic Fury will only cease when Iran presents an “unconditional surrender.” What that actually means is vague at best.
The president — who previously said “unconditional surrender” could be either an explicit capitulation by the Iranian regime or “when they can’t fight any longer because they don’t have anyone or anything to fight with” — now seems to indicate that the latter option is already becoming a reality.
“There’s almost nothing left to strike in Iran,” Trump told Axios on Wednesday, going on to say that “the war will end soon.”
President Donald Trump waves from the stairs of Air Force One as he boards upon his arrival at Joint Base Andrews, Md., Wednesday, March 11, 2026. (AP Photo/Luis M. Alvarez)
“It will end whenever I want it to end,” he added.
White House spokeswoman Anna Kelly told the Washington Examiner on Thursday the war will continue until the president “determines that the goals of Operation Epic Fury, including for Iran to no longer pose a military threat, have been fully realized.”
Trump’s nebulous temperature check on the conflict highlights increasing frustration among Democrats and members of the president’s own party as the winstate conditions that would end Operation Epic Fury, which is approaching its second week, remain undefined.
Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) described himself as “dissatisfied and angry” following a Tuesday briefing given to the Senate Armed Services Committee, saying he left with “more questions than answers.”
Even among Trump’s allies and supporters of Operation Epic Fury, there is a question mark hanging over the next phase of the conflict.
Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO), asked by Fox News on Tuesday what goals are yet to be achieved in Iran, responded: “What is there really that’s left to do that we haven’t already done?”
Annika Ganzeveld, the Middle East portfolio manager for the Critical Threats Project at the American Enterprise Institute, told the Washington Examiner, “It all depends on what the ultimate goal of this campaign is, and that will determine the likely length of it.”
She added: “If those objectives are, for example, to degrade Iran’s nuclear and ballistic missile programs, that will take a much shorter time than if, say, the ultimate objective is setting conditions to change the regime.”
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt previously told Fox News that the hypothetical “unconditional surrender” that would end the …
Are they actually going to vote on something real?
President Donald Trump has stated repeatedly that Operation Epic Fury will only cease when Iran presents an “unconditional surrender.” What that actually means is vague at best.
The president — who previously said “unconditional surrender” could be either an explicit capitulation by the Iranian regime or “when they can’t fight any longer because they don’t have anyone or anything to fight with” — now seems to indicate that the latter option is already becoming a reality.
“There’s almost nothing left to strike in Iran,” Trump told Axios on Wednesday, going on to say that “the war will end soon.”
President Donald Trump waves from the stairs of Air Force One as he boards upon his arrival at Joint Base Andrews, Md., Wednesday, March 11, 2026. (AP Photo/Luis M. Alvarez)
“It will end whenever I want it to end,” he added.
White House spokeswoman Anna Kelly told the Washington Examiner on Thursday the war will continue until the president “determines that the goals of Operation Epic Fury, including for Iran to no longer pose a military threat, have been fully realized.”
Trump’s nebulous temperature check on the conflict highlights increasing frustration among Democrats and members of the president’s own party as the winstate conditions that would end Operation Epic Fury, which is approaching its second week, remain undefined.
Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) described himself as “dissatisfied and angry” following a Tuesday briefing given to the Senate Armed Services Committee, saying he left with “more questions than answers.”
Even among Trump’s allies and supporters of Operation Epic Fury, there is a question mark hanging over the next phase of the conflict.
Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO), asked by Fox News on Tuesday what goals are yet to be achieved in Iran, responded: “What is there really that’s left to do that we haven’t already done?”
Annika Ganzeveld, the Middle East portfolio manager for the Critical Threats Project at the American Enterprise Institute, told the Washington Examiner, “It all depends on what the ultimate goal of this campaign is, and that will determine the likely length of it.”
She added: “If those objectives are, for example, to degrade Iran’s nuclear and ballistic missile programs, that will take a much shorter time than if, say, the ultimate objective is setting conditions to change the regime.”
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt previously told Fox News that the hypothetical “unconditional surrender” that would end the …
Trump’s evolving stance on Iran ‘unconditional surrender’
Are they actually going to vote on something real?
President Donald Trump has stated repeatedly that Operation Epic Fury will only cease when Iran presents an “unconditional surrender.” What that actually means is vague at best.
The president — who previously said “unconditional surrender” could be either an explicit capitulation by the Iranian regime or “when they can’t fight any longer because they don’t have anyone or anything to fight with” — now seems to indicate that the latter option is already becoming a reality.
“There’s almost nothing left to strike in Iran,” Trump told Axios on Wednesday, going on to say that “the war will end soon.”
President Donald Trump waves from the stairs of Air Force One as he boards upon his arrival at Joint Base Andrews, Md., Wednesday, March 11, 2026. (AP Photo/Luis M. Alvarez)
“It will end whenever I want it to end,” he added.
White House spokeswoman Anna Kelly told the Washington Examiner on Thursday the war will continue until the president “determines that the goals of Operation Epic Fury, including for Iran to no longer pose a military threat, have been fully realized.”
Trump’s nebulous temperature check on the conflict highlights increasing frustration among Democrats and members of the president’s own party as the winstate conditions that would end Operation Epic Fury, which is approaching its second week, remain undefined.
Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) described himself as “dissatisfied and angry” following a Tuesday briefing given to the Senate Armed Services Committee, saying he left with “more questions than answers.”
Even among Trump’s allies and supporters of Operation Epic Fury, there is a question mark hanging over the next phase of the conflict.
Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO), asked by Fox News on Tuesday what goals are yet to be achieved in Iran, responded: “What is there really that’s left to do that we haven’t already done?”
Annika Ganzeveld, the Middle East portfolio manager for the Critical Threats Project at the American Enterprise Institute, told the Washington Examiner, “It all depends on what the ultimate goal of this campaign is, and that will determine the likely length of it.”
She added: “If those objectives are, for example, to degrade Iran’s nuclear and ballistic missile programs, that will take a much shorter time than if, say, the ultimate objective is setting conditions to change the regime.”
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt previously told Fox News that the hypothetical “unconditional surrender” that would end the …
0 Comments
0 Shares
37 Views
0 Reviews