House GOP Pressures Senate on ‘Talking Filibuster’ for SAVE Act
What's the endgame here?
House Republicans are pressuring the Senate to employ a risky procedural maneuver to force a vote on election integrity legislation.
The SAVE America Act would institute national requirements of proof of citizenship to register to vote, as well as photo identification to vote in federal elections.
In recent days, Rep. Anna Paulina Luna, R-Fla., has publicly urged Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., to force a “standing filibuster,” also known as a “talking filibuster,” in the Senate. This procedural maneuver could force Democrats to continue talking in order to stall the passage of bills, rather than just killing the bill by withholding their support indefinitely.
But Thune, a supporter of the SAVE America Act, has warned the approach would use up valuable floor time.
“We will vote on the SAVE Act, but… triggering a talking filibuster has ramifications, implications that I think everybody needs to be aware of,” Thune said.
An update regarding the SAVE (America) Act and Voter ID:
— Anna Paulina Luna (@realannapaulina) February 4, 2026
The Daily Signal spoke to Republicans in both chambers of Congress who gave their opinion on the matter.
The House
Rep. Greg Steube, R-Fla., is one House conservative with little reverence for the Senate filibuster. For most legislation in the Senate, 60 senators must vote to end debate in order for a bill to come to a final vote.
“The bottom line is the only way the SAVE Act passes is if the filibuster’s [overcome], whether it’s the standing filibuster or just doing away with it all together,” Steube told The Daily Signal.
With all due respect, these excuses aren’t going to cut it.
The American people rightfully expect our Republican Congress to DELIVER on our promises.
To do so, we must return to the talking filibuster and pass real, America First wins.
Starting with the SAVE Act.
— Rep. Andrew Clyde (@Rep_Clyde) February 3, 2026
Steube also revealed Luna was trying to get House Republican signatures on a letter to Senate Republican leadership to overcome the 60-vote threshold.
A spokesman for Luna did not respond to a request for confirmation of whether she was circulating a letter.
How Would the Talking Filibuster Work?
The idea of a talking filibuster is to enforce rule 19 of the Standing Rules of the Senate, which states, “no Senator shall speak more than twice upon any one question in debate on the same legislative day without leave of the Senate.”
Under the rule, Senate Republicans would refuse to adjourn and would force Democrats to talk in order to filibuster the bill. Once the Democrats ran out of speeches on the question of the bill, it would come to a vote and pass by a simple majority.
However, under this procedure, Democrats could use up hundreds of hours of floor time on just one legislative question.
Rep. Roy breaks down how Leader Thune can force a talking filibuster on the SAVE America Act, requiring Democrats to take the floor and explain to the American people why they oppose securing our elections.
WATCH??
— Rep. Chip Roy Press Office (@RepChipRoy) February 5, 2026
Forcing the talking …
What's the endgame here?
House Republicans are pressuring the Senate to employ a risky procedural maneuver to force a vote on election integrity legislation.
The SAVE America Act would institute national requirements of proof of citizenship to register to vote, as well as photo identification to vote in federal elections.
In recent days, Rep. Anna Paulina Luna, R-Fla., has publicly urged Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., to force a “standing filibuster,” also known as a “talking filibuster,” in the Senate. This procedural maneuver could force Democrats to continue talking in order to stall the passage of bills, rather than just killing the bill by withholding their support indefinitely.
But Thune, a supporter of the SAVE America Act, has warned the approach would use up valuable floor time.
“We will vote on the SAVE Act, but… triggering a talking filibuster has ramifications, implications that I think everybody needs to be aware of,” Thune said.
An update regarding the SAVE (America) Act and Voter ID:
— Anna Paulina Luna (@realannapaulina) February 4, 2026
The Daily Signal spoke to Republicans in both chambers of Congress who gave their opinion on the matter.
The House
Rep. Greg Steube, R-Fla., is one House conservative with little reverence for the Senate filibuster. For most legislation in the Senate, 60 senators must vote to end debate in order for a bill to come to a final vote.
“The bottom line is the only way the SAVE Act passes is if the filibuster’s [overcome], whether it’s the standing filibuster or just doing away with it all together,” Steube told The Daily Signal.
With all due respect, these excuses aren’t going to cut it.
The American people rightfully expect our Republican Congress to DELIVER on our promises.
To do so, we must return to the talking filibuster and pass real, America First wins.
Starting with the SAVE Act.
— Rep. Andrew Clyde (@Rep_Clyde) February 3, 2026
Steube also revealed Luna was trying to get House Republican signatures on a letter to Senate Republican leadership to overcome the 60-vote threshold.
A spokesman for Luna did not respond to a request for confirmation of whether she was circulating a letter.
How Would the Talking Filibuster Work?
The idea of a talking filibuster is to enforce rule 19 of the Standing Rules of the Senate, which states, “no Senator shall speak more than twice upon any one question in debate on the same legislative day without leave of the Senate.”
Under the rule, Senate Republicans would refuse to adjourn and would force Democrats to talk in order to filibuster the bill. Once the Democrats ran out of speeches on the question of the bill, it would come to a vote and pass by a simple majority.
However, under this procedure, Democrats could use up hundreds of hours of floor time on just one legislative question.
Rep. Roy breaks down how Leader Thune can force a talking filibuster on the SAVE America Act, requiring Democrats to take the floor and explain to the American people why they oppose securing our elections.
WATCH??
— Rep. Chip Roy Press Office (@RepChipRoy) February 5, 2026
Forcing the talking …
House GOP Pressures Senate on ‘Talking Filibuster’ for SAVE Act
What's the endgame here?
House Republicans are pressuring the Senate to employ a risky procedural maneuver to force a vote on election integrity legislation.
The SAVE America Act would institute national requirements of proof of citizenship to register to vote, as well as photo identification to vote in federal elections.
In recent days, Rep. Anna Paulina Luna, R-Fla., has publicly urged Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., to force a “standing filibuster,” also known as a “talking filibuster,” in the Senate. This procedural maneuver could force Democrats to continue talking in order to stall the passage of bills, rather than just killing the bill by withholding their support indefinitely.
But Thune, a supporter of the SAVE America Act, has warned the approach would use up valuable floor time.
“We will vote on the SAVE Act, but… triggering a talking filibuster has ramifications, implications that I think everybody needs to be aware of,” Thune said.
An update regarding the SAVE (America) Act and Voter ID:
— Anna Paulina Luna (@realannapaulina) February 4, 2026
The Daily Signal spoke to Republicans in both chambers of Congress who gave their opinion on the matter.
The House
Rep. Greg Steube, R-Fla., is one House conservative with little reverence for the Senate filibuster. For most legislation in the Senate, 60 senators must vote to end debate in order for a bill to come to a final vote.
“The bottom line is the only way the SAVE Act passes is if the filibuster’s [overcome], whether it’s the standing filibuster or just doing away with it all together,” Steube told The Daily Signal.
With all due respect, these excuses aren’t going to cut it.
The American people rightfully expect our Republican Congress to DELIVER on our promises.
To do so, we must return to the talking filibuster and pass real, America First wins.
Starting with the SAVE Act.
— Rep. Andrew Clyde (@Rep_Clyde) February 3, 2026
Steube also revealed Luna was trying to get House Republican signatures on a letter to Senate Republican leadership to overcome the 60-vote threshold.
A spokesman for Luna did not respond to a request for confirmation of whether she was circulating a letter.
How Would the Talking Filibuster Work?
The idea of a talking filibuster is to enforce rule 19 of the Standing Rules of the Senate, which states, “no Senator shall speak more than twice upon any one question in debate on the same legislative day without leave of the Senate.”
Under the rule, Senate Republicans would refuse to adjourn and would force Democrats to talk in order to filibuster the bill. Once the Democrats ran out of speeches on the question of the bill, it would come to a vote and pass by a simple majority.
However, under this procedure, Democrats could use up hundreds of hours of floor time on just one legislative question.
Rep. Roy breaks down how Leader Thune can force a talking filibuster on the SAVE America Act, requiring Democrats to take the floor and explain to the American people why they oppose securing our elections.
WATCH??
— Rep. Chip Roy Press Office (@RepChipRoy) February 5, 2026
Forcing the talking …
0 Comments
0 Shares
47 Views
0 Reviews