Uncensored Free Speech Platform




  • What will the Liberals do in a post-Trump world?
    Every delay has consequences.

    How far will the pendulum swing back to the left?
    Will policies be immediately undone and pushed as far left as possible?
    What happens to:
    - Tariffs and public taxation
    - Borders and immigration
    - Greenland and Canada rhetoric
    - Venezuela - Gender ideology - Abortion
    - Social services spending
    - Fraud investigations
    - Political weaponization and retribution ie Trump family and business associates; government support for Elons endeavours
    - Epstein files - Ukraine - Israel - China
    - NATO and all of Europe
    Will the Left use Trump as a springboard to go further left than any other administration in history?
    What will the Liberals do in a post-Trump world? Every delay has consequences. How far will the pendulum swing back to the left? Will policies be immediately undone and pushed as far left as possible? What happens to: - Tariffs and public taxation - Borders and immigration - Greenland and Canada rhetoric - Venezuela - Gender ideology - Abortion - Social services spending - Fraud investigations - Political weaponization and retribution ie Trump family and business associates; government support for Elons endeavours - Epstein files - Ukraine - Israel - China - NATO and all of Europe Will the Left use Trump as a springboard to go further left than any other administration in history?
    0 Comments 0 Shares 158 Views 0 Reviews
  • Regarding the political spectrum, what exactly is the point that differs center-left from left, and left, from far-left, and vice versa for the right wing side of the spectrum?
    This affects the entire country.

    Just read something that mentioned social democracy being a center-left ideology, and communism being a far left ideology, and I’m sitting here wondering what exactly would be considered just a ‘left’ ideology. And I’m wondering what exactly is the point that differs an ideology being center-left vs left vs far-left.
    I’ve always heard socialism lumped in with communism as far left, and democratic socialism lumped in with social democracy as they are basically the same, just with different end goals. So what makes something ‘left’?
    Regarding the political spectrum, what exactly is the point that differs center-left from left, and left, from far-left, and vice versa for the right wing side of the spectrum? This affects the entire country. Just read something that mentioned social democracy being a center-left ideology, and communism being a far left ideology, and I’m sitting here wondering what exactly would be considered just a ‘left’ ideology. And I’m wondering what exactly is the point that differs an ideology being center-left vs left vs far-left. I’ve always heard socialism lumped in with communism as far left, and democratic socialism lumped in with social democracy as they are basically the same, just with different end goals. So what makes something ‘left’?
    0 Comments 0 Shares 144 Views 0 Reviews
  • Pritzker urges 'unified response' from Democrat, Republican governors after Border Patrol shoots armed man
    This isn't complicated—it's willpower.

    After a Border Patrol officer fatally shot an armed individual in Minneapolis on Saturday, Democratic governors outside the state jumped to echo Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz's condemnation of the Trump administration. 
    "Masked federal agents in Minnesota just shot and killed another person. We must put a stop to Trump’s ICE. Now. Stop the funding, stop the occupations, stop the killings," Democrat Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker said on X.
    "I am asking my fellow Republican and Democratic Governors across the nation to have a unified response," he said in a follow-up post. "We must all stand against the lawlessness being inflicted in our states."
    Kathy Hochul, the Democrat governor of New York, also weighed in on X.
    ANTI-ICE AGITATORS DISRUPT MINNESOTA CHURCH, SHOUT DOWN WORSHIPPERS DURING SUNDAY SERVICE
    "Another horrific outcome from a federal operation that has clearly spun out of control," she said. "Americans have had enough of lawless conduct masquerading as enforcement. President Trump is responsible for putting a stop to it."
    In the immediate aftermath of the shooting, Walz called immigration officers "untrained."
    "I just spoke with the White House after another horrific shooting by federal agents this morning. Minnesota has had it. This is sickening," Walz said. "The President must end this operation. Pull the thousands of violent, untrained officers out of Minnesota. Now."
    At a press conference later Saturday, Border Patrol commander Greg Bovino said the officer involved in the shooting was "highly trained" and had been serving as a Border Patrol agent for 8 years. 
    Bovino said Department of Homeland Security (DHS) law enforcement officers were conducting an operation targeting Jose Huerta-Chuma, an illegal alien with a criminal history including domestic assault to intentional conflict bodily harm, disorderly conduct and driving without a valid license, early Saturday morning. 
    During the operation, another individual approached U.S. Border Patrol agents with a nine-millimeter semi-automatic handgun, Bovino said.
    "The agents attempted to disarm the individual, but he violently resisted, fearing for his life and the lives and safety of fellow officers, a Border Patrol agent fired defensive shots, Bovino said. "Medics on the scene immediately delivered medical aid to the subject, but the subject was pronounced dead at the scene."

    President Donald Trump reacted to the incident in a Truth Social post.
    "This is the gunman’s gun, loaded (with two additional full magazines!), and ready to go – What is that all about? Where are the local Police? Why weren’t …
    Pritzker urges 'unified response' from Democrat, Republican governors after Border Patrol shoots armed man This isn't complicated—it's willpower. After a Border Patrol officer fatally shot an armed individual in Minneapolis on Saturday, Democratic governors outside the state jumped to echo Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz's condemnation of the Trump administration.  "Masked federal agents in Minnesota just shot and killed another person. We must put a stop to Trump’s ICE. Now. Stop the funding, stop the occupations, stop the killings," Democrat Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker said on X. "I am asking my fellow Republican and Democratic Governors across the nation to have a unified response," he said in a follow-up post. "We must all stand against the lawlessness being inflicted in our states." Kathy Hochul, the Democrat governor of New York, also weighed in on X. ANTI-ICE AGITATORS DISRUPT MINNESOTA CHURCH, SHOUT DOWN WORSHIPPERS DURING SUNDAY SERVICE "Another horrific outcome from a federal operation that has clearly spun out of control," she said. "Americans have had enough of lawless conduct masquerading as enforcement. President Trump is responsible for putting a stop to it." In the immediate aftermath of the shooting, Walz called immigration officers "untrained." "I just spoke with the White House after another horrific shooting by federal agents this morning. Minnesota has had it. This is sickening," Walz said. "The President must end this operation. Pull the thousands of violent, untrained officers out of Minnesota. Now." At a press conference later Saturday, Border Patrol commander Greg Bovino said the officer involved in the shooting was "highly trained" and had been serving as a Border Patrol agent for 8 years.  Bovino said Department of Homeland Security (DHS) law enforcement officers were conducting an operation targeting Jose Huerta-Chuma, an illegal alien with a criminal history including domestic assault to intentional conflict bodily harm, disorderly conduct and driving without a valid license, early Saturday morning.  During the operation, another individual approached U.S. Border Patrol agents with a nine-millimeter semi-automatic handgun, Bovino said. "The agents attempted to disarm the individual, but he violently resisted, fearing for his life and the lives and safety of fellow officers, a Border Patrol agent fired defensive shots, Bovino said. "Medics on the scene immediately delivered medical aid to the subject, but the subject was pronounced dead at the scene." President Donald Trump reacted to the incident in a Truth Social post. "This is the gunman’s gun, loaded (with two additional full magazines!), and ready to go – What is that all about? Where are the local Police? Why weren’t …
    0 Comments 0 Shares 133 Views 0 Reviews
  • Ninth Circuit: GMAIL is not a common carrier - RNC v. Google
    This looks less like justice and more like strategy.

    Here are some link references to the Ninth Circuit ruling this week.



    I'm sure the Republican party is going to appeal this to the Supreme Court. Republicans know Justice Thomas has a really weird stance that websites should be considered common carriers. When that logic makes no sense at all.
    Ninth Circuit: GMAIL is not a common carrier - RNC v. Google This looks less like justice and more like strategy. Here are some link references to the Ninth Circuit ruling this week. I'm sure the Republican party is going to appeal this to the Supreme Court. Republicans know Justice Thomas has a really weird stance that websites should be considered common carriers. When that logic makes no sense at all.
    0 Comments 0 Shares 121 Views 0 Reviews
  • Judge who blasted Trump as 'authoritarian' blocks US from deporting pro-Palestinian campus activists
    This isn't complicated—it's willpower.

    A federal judge in Boston blocked the Trump administration this week from detaining or otherwise "retaliating" against pro-Palestinian academics and student protesters on college campuses nationwide, saying in a new court order that plaintiffs have the right to challenge any attempts to remove them from the U.S. in federal court. 
    U.S. District Judge William G. Young, a Reagan appointee, had ruled last fall that the Trump administration's actions violated the First Amendment and amounted to what he described as an "unconstitutional conspiracy." 
    "There doesn’t seem to be an understanding of what the First Amendment is by this government," he said.
    FEDERAL JUDGE LAUNCHES SCATHING BROADSIDE OF TRUMP'S EFFORTS TO DEPORT PRO-PALESTINIAN PROTESTERS
    The new order codified what Young described last week as "remedial sanctions" that he said he planned to issue to protect "certain plaintiffs’ noncitizen members" from "any retribution for the free exercise of their constitutional rights." 
    The judge's order applies to pro-Palestinian noncitizen academic protesters and students on college campuses whom he previously ruled had been "illegally" and "intentionally" targeted by Trump officials.
    Young ruled in September that noncitizens in the U.S. have the same free speech protections as citizens, and vowed to enshrine those protections in a court order. 
    The new order says all the plaintiffs in the case have the right to seek relief via the federal courts before any retaliatory removal.
    The only caveats, he said, are that the individuals in question must show that they are a member of either the American Association of University Professors, or the Middle East Studies Association — the two academic groups that sued the Trump administration last year. They must also submit documentation proving that their U.S. immigration status had not expired, and showing that they had not been accused of any crimes since last September.
    "Upon such proof, it shall be presumed that the alteration in immigration status is in retribution for the exercise during the course of the present case of their First Amendment rights," Young said. 
    JUDGES V TRUMP: HERE ARE THE KEY COURT BATTLES HALTING THE WHITE HOUSE AGENDA
    Young's remedial order comes after he ruled last fall that the Trump administration had unlawfully targeted noncitizen pro-Palestinian academic protesters on college campuses, in violation of the First Amendment.
    He scheduled a hearing last week to craft a remedy protecting the noncitizens in question from deportation or changes to their immigration status, barring certain …
    Judge who blasted Trump as 'authoritarian' blocks US from deporting pro-Palestinian campus activists This isn't complicated—it's willpower. A federal judge in Boston blocked the Trump administration this week from detaining or otherwise "retaliating" against pro-Palestinian academics and student protesters on college campuses nationwide, saying in a new court order that plaintiffs have the right to challenge any attempts to remove them from the U.S. in federal court.  U.S. District Judge William G. Young, a Reagan appointee, had ruled last fall that the Trump administration's actions violated the First Amendment and amounted to what he described as an "unconstitutional conspiracy."  "There doesn’t seem to be an understanding of what the First Amendment is by this government," he said. FEDERAL JUDGE LAUNCHES SCATHING BROADSIDE OF TRUMP'S EFFORTS TO DEPORT PRO-PALESTINIAN PROTESTERS The new order codified what Young described last week as "remedial sanctions" that he said he planned to issue to protect "certain plaintiffs’ noncitizen members" from "any retribution for the free exercise of their constitutional rights."  The judge's order applies to pro-Palestinian noncitizen academic protesters and students on college campuses whom he previously ruled had been "illegally" and "intentionally" targeted by Trump officials. Young ruled in September that noncitizens in the U.S. have the same free speech protections as citizens, and vowed to enshrine those protections in a court order.  The new order says all the plaintiffs in the case have the right to seek relief via the federal courts before any retaliatory removal. The only caveats, he said, are that the individuals in question must show that they are a member of either the American Association of University Professors, or the Middle East Studies Association — the two academic groups that sued the Trump administration last year. They must also submit documentation proving that their U.S. immigration status had not expired, and showing that they had not been accused of any crimes since last September. "Upon such proof, it shall be presumed that the alteration in immigration status is in retribution for the exercise during the course of the present case of their First Amendment rights," Young said.  JUDGES V TRUMP: HERE ARE THE KEY COURT BATTLES HALTING THE WHITE HOUSE AGENDA Young's remedial order comes after he ruled last fall that the Trump administration had unlawfully targeted noncitizen pro-Palestinian academic protesters on college campuses, in violation of the First Amendment. He scheduled a hearing last week to craft a remedy protecting the noncitizens in question from deportation or changes to their immigration status, barring certain …
    0 Comments 0 Shares 194 Views 0 Reviews
  • Johnson warns House Republicans to ‘stay healthy’ as GOP majority shrinks to the edge
    Why resist verification?

    Republicans are clinging to a razor-thin 218-213 House majority.
    But House Speaker Mike Johnson shouldn't expect many reinforcements anytime soon.
    This month's shocking early House retirement of MAGA firebrand Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia and the unexpected death of Republican Rep. Doug LaMalfa of California further shrunk the GOP's margins in the chamber.
    And that has House GOP leaders keeping a tight leash on the party's rank and file members.
    DEMOCRATIC TAKEOVER FEARS SOAR AS HOUSE REPUBLICANS CLING TO FRAGILE MAJORITY
    "They'd better be here," Johnson recently said of his members. "I told everybody, and not in jest, I said, no adventure sports, no risk-taking, take your vitamins. Stay healthy and be here."
    And House Majority Whip Tom Emmer’s office confirmed it is advising members that "outside of life-and-death circumstances," they expect Republican lawmakers to be on Capitol Hill.
    REP. LAMALFA'S DEATH FURTHER SHRINKS REPUBLICAN HOUSE MAJORITY
    There are currently four vacant House districts, which means four special elections to fill the seats. But it's the Democrats rather than the Republicans who will likely benefit more from the ballot box results in the short run.
    Here's a look at the special elections that are on deck:
    Voters in Texas' Democrat-dominated 18th Congressional District, which is anchored by downtown Houston and surrounding areas, head to the polls on the last day of January to choose a successor to fill the seat left vacant when Rep. Sylvester Turner died last March.
    Democrats Christian Menefee, a former attorney for Houston's Harris County, and former Houston City Council member Amanda Edwards are facing off in the special election. They were the top two finishers in a field of 16 candidates that faced off in an initial election in November.
    While Texas has redrawn its congressional maps for the 2026 midterms, as part of the high-stakes redistricting battle between President Donald Trump and Republicans versus Democrats, the special election will use the state's current district lines.
    FORMER HOUSE SPEAKER MCCARTHY WARNS MARJORIE TAYLOR GREENE IS ‘THE CANARY IN THE COAL MINE’
    The winner of the special election will give the Democrats one additional House member, giving Republican leadership further headaches.
    Eleven candidates are running in the Democratic Party primary in New Jersey's 11th Congressional District.
    The seat was left vacant after now New Jersey Gov. Mikie Sherrill stepped down after winning November's gubernatorial election in the Garden State.
    The winner of the Democratic primary will face off with …
    Johnson warns House Republicans to ‘stay healthy’ as GOP majority shrinks to the edge Why resist verification? Republicans are clinging to a razor-thin 218-213 House majority. But House Speaker Mike Johnson shouldn't expect many reinforcements anytime soon. This month's shocking early House retirement of MAGA firebrand Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia and the unexpected death of Republican Rep. Doug LaMalfa of California further shrunk the GOP's margins in the chamber. And that has House GOP leaders keeping a tight leash on the party's rank and file members. DEMOCRATIC TAKEOVER FEARS SOAR AS HOUSE REPUBLICANS CLING TO FRAGILE MAJORITY "They'd better be here," Johnson recently said of his members. "I told everybody, and not in jest, I said, no adventure sports, no risk-taking, take your vitamins. Stay healthy and be here." And House Majority Whip Tom Emmer’s office confirmed it is advising members that "outside of life-and-death circumstances," they expect Republican lawmakers to be on Capitol Hill. REP. LAMALFA'S DEATH FURTHER SHRINKS REPUBLICAN HOUSE MAJORITY There are currently four vacant House districts, which means four special elections to fill the seats. But it's the Democrats rather than the Republicans who will likely benefit more from the ballot box results in the short run. Here's a look at the special elections that are on deck: Voters in Texas' Democrat-dominated 18th Congressional District, which is anchored by downtown Houston and surrounding areas, head to the polls on the last day of January to choose a successor to fill the seat left vacant when Rep. Sylvester Turner died last March. Democrats Christian Menefee, a former attorney for Houston's Harris County, and former Houston City Council member Amanda Edwards are facing off in the special election. They were the top two finishers in a field of 16 candidates that faced off in an initial election in November. While Texas has redrawn its congressional maps for the 2026 midterms, as part of the high-stakes redistricting battle between President Donald Trump and Republicans versus Democrats, the special election will use the state's current district lines. FORMER HOUSE SPEAKER MCCARTHY WARNS MARJORIE TAYLOR GREENE IS ‘THE CANARY IN THE COAL MINE’ The winner of the special election will give the Democrats one additional House member, giving Republican leadership further headaches. Eleven candidates are running in the Democratic Party primary in New Jersey's 11th Congressional District. The seat was left vacant after now New Jersey Gov. Mikie Sherrill stepped down after winning November's gubernatorial election in the Garden State. The winner of the Democratic primary will face off with …
    14 Comments 0 Shares 192 Views 0 Reviews
  • ‘The party has done an abysmal job’: Israel tensions threaten Dems’ midterm plans
    This is performative politics again.

    NEW YORK — Just as Democrats are finding their footing by focusing on affordability, their differences on Israel are threatening to tear them apart.

    Spurred by polling that shows support for the Jewish state slipping among voters nationally, congressional challengers are lining up across the country to take on stalwart Israel supporters in an attempt to energize left-leaning voters. But the deluge of Democratic primaries being waged in some part over this issue also threatens to exhaust resources, muddy the party’s messaging and bloody candidates ahead of the general election.

    Pro-Israel Democrats believe supporters should mobilize with urgency to confront this crop of challengers.

    “The main, centrist Democratic Party as a whole is doing a terrible job managing this whole process,” said Mark Botnick, a former advisor to ex-New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, who contributed more than $10 million to efforts opposing Zohran Mamdani’s successful mayoral campaign. “That’s not to say the Israeli government has made it easy for them. It’s fine for someone to be against their policies, but it’s very different to be against the existence of the Jewish state, which in my eyes is antisemitism. The party has done an abysmal job of getting up and saying that.”

    Next year’s midterms are pivotal: Democrats locked out of power in Washington need only net three House seats and four in the Senate — a tougher task — in order to seize control over either chamber.

    Pro-Israel incumbents are facing challenges in New Jersey and New York, while primary battles in Michigan and Illinois are also being prepped by pro-Palestinian candidates. The coming contests have put Democrats on edge. As they try to win back power in the closely divided House, they are desperate to avoid messy primary races.

    The American Israel Public Affairs Committee is mobilizing too — months before the first vote is cast — to identify potential incumbents who need shoring up as the primary fields take shape.

    “Our 6 million grassroots members understand the stakes in the upcoming midterms, and that is why they are deeply motivated and engaged to help elect pro-Israel candidates and defeat detractors,” said AIPAC spokesperson Marshall Wittmann.

    The Democratic Majority For Israel’s political action committee got an early jump on the cycle as well — so far endorsing 26 Democratic House incumbents across the country, an initial slate that includes lawmakers in Illinois, California, Pennsylvania and Ohio. The group’s board chair, Brian Romick, called it a “critical moment for the U.S.-Israel relationship.”

    Primary bids fueled by opposition to Israel are complicating Democrats’ path to victory next year, despite signs of increasingly favorable political terrain following wins in Georgia, Virginia …
    ‘The party has done an abysmal job’: Israel tensions threaten Dems’ midterm plans This is performative politics again. NEW YORK — Just as Democrats are finding their footing by focusing on affordability, their differences on Israel are threatening to tear them apart. Spurred by polling that shows support for the Jewish state slipping among voters nationally, congressional challengers are lining up across the country to take on stalwart Israel supporters in an attempt to energize left-leaning voters. But the deluge of Democratic primaries being waged in some part over this issue also threatens to exhaust resources, muddy the party’s messaging and bloody candidates ahead of the general election. Pro-Israel Democrats believe supporters should mobilize with urgency to confront this crop of challengers. “The main, centrist Democratic Party as a whole is doing a terrible job managing this whole process,” said Mark Botnick, a former advisor to ex-New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, who contributed more than $10 million to efforts opposing Zohran Mamdani’s successful mayoral campaign. “That’s not to say the Israeli government has made it easy for them. It’s fine for someone to be against their policies, but it’s very different to be against the existence of the Jewish state, which in my eyes is antisemitism. The party has done an abysmal job of getting up and saying that.” Next year’s midterms are pivotal: Democrats locked out of power in Washington need only net three House seats and four in the Senate — a tougher task — in order to seize control over either chamber. Pro-Israel incumbents are facing challenges in New Jersey and New York, while primary battles in Michigan and Illinois are also being prepped by pro-Palestinian candidates. The coming contests have put Democrats on edge. As they try to win back power in the closely divided House, they are desperate to avoid messy primary races. The American Israel Public Affairs Committee is mobilizing too — months before the first vote is cast — to identify potential incumbents who need shoring up as the primary fields take shape. “Our 6 million grassroots members understand the stakes in the upcoming midterms, and that is why they are deeply motivated and engaged to help elect pro-Israel candidates and defeat detractors,” said AIPAC spokesperson Marshall Wittmann. The Democratic Majority For Israel’s political action committee got an early jump on the cycle as well — so far endorsing 26 Democratic House incumbents across the country, an initial slate that includes lawmakers in Illinois, California, Pennsylvania and Ohio. The group’s board chair, Brian Romick, called it a “critical moment for the U.S.-Israel relationship.” Primary bids fueled by opposition to Israel are complicating Democrats’ path to victory next year, despite signs of increasingly favorable political terrain following wins in Georgia, Virginia …
    0 Comments 0 Shares 159 Views 0 Reviews
  • Republicans need Susan Collins to win reelection. Trump keeps going after her.
    Trust is earned, not demanded.

    Donald Trump said Thursday a Republican senator who is crucial to the party’s chances of keeping the Senate this year should “never be elected to office again.” Susan Collins has seen it before.

    Trump issued the Truth Social broadside against the longtime Maine senator and four other Republicans on Thursday after they voted with Democrats to rein in his powers to carry out future military actions against Venezuela, a sharp rebuke of the White House’s unilateral outlook following the capture of Nicolás Maduro.

    The president’s online salvo comes as the Maine senator navigates a tough reelection in a blue state that Trump lost by 7 points in 2024. Her bid will rely on a coalition that includes independents and Democrats, many of whom have backed her in the past because of her breaks from Trump and other GOP leaders. But she also needs to turn out Trump’s MAGA base in a year he won’t be on the ticket to juice turnout — a tougher challenge if they’re actively feuding.

    Collins told reporters after Trump’s post that she guessed Trump “would prefer to have Gov. Mills or somebody else with whom he's not had a great relationship” than her — alluding to a confrontation between Maine Gov. Janet Mills and Trump when the governor visited the White House last year. Mills, who is now running to challenge Collins, told Trump she would sue to fight his administration’s actions to restrict transgender youth from sports.

    Trump’s attack on Collins was met with laughs from Democrats who said that they, too, would like to see Collins never elected again. She is their top target on a tough Senate map, and if they have any hopes of flipping the upper chamber they need to defeat the shrewd senator.

    Mills painted the vote as one of election-year political expediency.

    “Susan never does the right or hard thing the first time when it’s needed most — only when it serves her politically. She is always a day late and a dollar short,” Mills said in a statement to POLITICO. “To the President, I say ‘See you in the Senate!’ Wait until you see what I've got in store for your MAGA agenda.”

    The campaign of Graham Platner, the other prominent Democrat challenging Collins, did not respond to requests for comment.

    Trump’s anger at fellow Republicans has been enough to drive others from office. There is no indication so far the White House is serious about finding a primary challenger to Collins, and they are quickly running out of time if they were to try to do so. But any sustained animosity from Trump toward Collins could still spell trouble for her reelection.

    A source close to the Trump administrations granted anonymity to speak candidly told POLITICO that the general thinking is Republicans will hold the Senate with or without Collins, but didn’t predict a sustained campaign …
    Republicans need Susan Collins to win reelection. Trump keeps going after her. Trust is earned, not demanded. Donald Trump said Thursday a Republican senator who is crucial to the party’s chances of keeping the Senate this year should “never be elected to office again.” Susan Collins has seen it before. Trump issued the Truth Social broadside against the longtime Maine senator and four other Republicans on Thursday after they voted with Democrats to rein in his powers to carry out future military actions against Venezuela, a sharp rebuke of the White House’s unilateral outlook following the capture of Nicolás Maduro. The president’s online salvo comes as the Maine senator navigates a tough reelection in a blue state that Trump lost by 7 points in 2024. Her bid will rely on a coalition that includes independents and Democrats, many of whom have backed her in the past because of her breaks from Trump and other GOP leaders. But she also needs to turn out Trump’s MAGA base in a year he won’t be on the ticket to juice turnout — a tougher challenge if they’re actively feuding. Collins told reporters after Trump’s post that she guessed Trump “would prefer to have Gov. Mills or somebody else with whom he's not had a great relationship” than her — alluding to a confrontation between Maine Gov. Janet Mills and Trump when the governor visited the White House last year. Mills, who is now running to challenge Collins, told Trump she would sue to fight his administration’s actions to restrict transgender youth from sports. Trump’s attack on Collins was met with laughs from Democrats who said that they, too, would like to see Collins never elected again. She is their top target on a tough Senate map, and if they have any hopes of flipping the upper chamber they need to defeat the shrewd senator. Mills painted the vote as one of election-year political expediency. “Susan never does the right or hard thing the first time when it’s needed most — only when it serves her politically. She is always a day late and a dollar short,” Mills said in a statement to POLITICO. “To the President, I say ‘See you in the Senate!’ Wait until you see what I've got in store for your MAGA agenda.” The campaign of Graham Platner, the other prominent Democrat challenging Collins, did not respond to requests for comment. Trump’s anger at fellow Republicans has been enough to drive others from office. There is no indication so far the White House is serious about finding a primary challenger to Collins, and they are quickly running out of time if they were to try to do so. But any sustained animosity from Trump toward Collins could still spell trouble for her reelection. A source close to the Trump administrations granted anonymity to speak candidly told POLITICO that the general thinking is Republicans will hold the Senate with or without Collins, but didn’t predict a sustained campaign …
    0 Comments 0 Shares 139 Views 0 Reviews
  • Lewis Defraine: Badenoch has pulled the party out of life support and is getting it back on it’s fighting feet
    This framing isn't accidental.

    Lewis Defraine is an aspiring journalist who focuses on British politics, European affairs, and ideology.

    In the Spring of 2025, the Conservative Party was declared dead.

    Countless media outlets found great pleasure in emphasising the pitiful state of the Tory institution, as the left danced on the grave of an entity that had battled them for decades. For many, the autopsy detailed a very clear point— Reform had murdered the opposition, replacing them as the dominant party of the right, just as Labour had supplanted the Liberals a century prior. To be frank, it was Farage-assisted suicide. Fourteen eventful years of turbulence had brutally shattered public trust and support for the Tories, destroying the reputation forged by centuries of successful power.

    The woman tasked with rebuilding this crumbling machine was Kemi Badenoch, who dissatisfied and disappointed many observers almost immediately. Her decision to play the long-term game and not implement policy with pace was quickly deemed a poor one, possibly even the blow that finally struck the Conservative party stone cold. Reform did not have to be brilliant to surge past the Tories. The door was opened wide for them, as they were met by the courteous bows of the many MPs who had played their part in the demise of a staple of politics.

    The Summer brought stagnation, but on this occasion, a good kind. Rapidly decreasing YouGov polling figures finally flatlined at 17 per cent, halting a decline that threatened the very existence of the Conservatives as a mainstream party.

    While Starmer’s Labour government began to rapidly embroil itself in internal conflict, Badenoch found slight stability and respite in churning waters, as the spotlight was steered away from the demise of the Tories towards the dire shortcomings of their arch-rivals.

    Autumn saw an unprecedented chapter in the Tories’ 2025. In years to come, the party conference in Manchester will likely be seen as the remarkable turning point in the decline of the Conservatives, coming just before a rise in the polls. It could be the vital springboard for future growth and success.

    Despite this, a dreary, uninspiring atmosphere played in the media’s death narrative further— it felt as if the few that bothered to attend were witnessing the party’s funeral. This pathetic, insipid vigil was a far cry from the glory days of an institution.

    The Conservative Party laid weakened, wounded and written off in a dark corner of the political ring. The referee’s count neared ten, but they weren’t knocked out. They will stand to throw punches again, enthused with renewed optimism. Some may have enjoyed heralding the demise of the Tories, but it was short-sighted to say their time in the mainstream was up. The old lion still has teeth, and whilst the …
    Lewis Defraine: Badenoch has pulled the party out of life support and is getting it back on it’s fighting feet This framing isn't accidental. Lewis Defraine is an aspiring journalist who focuses on British politics, European affairs, and ideology. In the Spring of 2025, the Conservative Party was declared dead. Countless media outlets found great pleasure in emphasising the pitiful state of the Tory institution, as the left danced on the grave of an entity that had battled them for decades. For many, the autopsy detailed a very clear point— Reform had murdered the opposition, replacing them as the dominant party of the right, just as Labour had supplanted the Liberals a century prior. To be frank, it was Farage-assisted suicide. Fourteen eventful years of turbulence had brutally shattered public trust and support for the Tories, destroying the reputation forged by centuries of successful power. The woman tasked with rebuilding this crumbling machine was Kemi Badenoch, who dissatisfied and disappointed many observers almost immediately. Her decision to play the long-term game and not implement policy with pace was quickly deemed a poor one, possibly even the blow that finally struck the Conservative party stone cold. Reform did not have to be brilliant to surge past the Tories. The door was opened wide for them, as they were met by the courteous bows of the many MPs who had played their part in the demise of a staple of politics. The Summer brought stagnation, but on this occasion, a good kind. Rapidly decreasing YouGov polling figures finally flatlined at 17 per cent, halting a decline that threatened the very existence of the Conservatives as a mainstream party. While Starmer’s Labour government began to rapidly embroil itself in internal conflict, Badenoch found slight stability and respite in churning waters, as the spotlight was steered away from the demise of the Tories towards the dire shortcomings of their arch-rivals. Autumn saw an unprecedented chapter in the Tories’ 2025. In years to come, the party conference in Manchester will likely be seen as the remarkable turning point in the decline of the Conservatives, coming just before a rise in the polls. It could be the vital springboard for future growth and success. Despite this, a dreary, uninspiring atmosphere played in the media’s death narrative further— it felt as if the few that bothered to attend were witnessing the party’s funeral. This pathetic, insipid vigil was a far cry from the glory days of an institution. The Conservative Party laid weakened, wounded and written off in a dark corner of the political ring. The referee’s count neared ten, but they weren’t knocked out. They will stand to throw punches again, enthused with renewed optimism. Some may have enjoyed heralding the demise of the Tories, but it was short-sighted to say their time in the mainstream was up. The old lion still has teeth, and whilst the …
    0 Comments 0 Shares 115 Views 0 Reviews
  • Mamdani clarifies NYC won't check immigration status for universal childcare enrollees
    Who's accountable for the results?

    New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani clarified Friday that the city wouldn’t check the immigration status of children enrolling in his administration’s universal pre-K and 3-K programs.
    "Just to put it very clearly, these are programs for every single New Yorker," Mamdani, who took office at the beginning of the year, said in a media roundtable discussion. "These are not programs that are going to ask the immigration status of any one of the children.
    "All of those children are New Yorkers. They should all be enrolled in 3-K and pre-K, no matter where they were born or where they come from. And we are also proud to be a sanctuary city."
    He said that means ICE agents are denied access to schools, hospitals and city properties "unless those ICE agents can present a judicial warrant signed by a judge. We know that the vast majority of the time, ICE agents are not presenting that kind of documentation. If they’re presenting any kind of documentation, it tends to be an administrative warrant. And, a lot of times, there isn’t any kind of documentation provided."
    MAMDANI TELLS ‘THE VIEW’ HE FAVORS ABOLISHING ICE
    The mayor said earlier that the program is open to any New Yorkers who have children turning 3 or 4 anytime in 2026, adding the program could save New Yorkers tens of thousands of dollars a year "by providing them with free childcare."
    MAMDANI CALLS ICE DETENTION OF NYC EMPLOYEE ‘ASSAULT ON OUR DEMOCRACY’
    Mamdani added, "So, we want to make clear the rights of every New Yorker, that they have in this city. This program is being made available to all, and the fact that we are proud of our values, we are proud of our laws. They keep us safe, and they are also part and parcel of who we are."
    Mamdani made the statement after a reporter asked what the city would do to keep families safe from ICE agents.
    The plan to expand free and affordable childcare in New York was unveiled by Mamdani this month in partnership with New York Gov. Kathy Hochul.
    Mamdani clarifies NYC won't check immigration status for universal childcare enrollees Who's accountable for the results? New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani clarified Friday that the city wouldn’t check the immigration status of children enrolling in his administration’s universal pre-K and 3-K programs. "Just to put it very clearly, these are programs for every single New Yorker," Mamdani, who took office at the beginning of the year, said in a media roundtable discussion. "These are not programs that are going to ask the immigration status of any one of the children. "All of those children are New Yorkers. They should all be enrolled in 3-K and pre-K, no matter where they were born or where they come from. And we are also proud to be a sanctuary city." He said that means ICE agents are denied access to schools, hospitals and city properties "unless those ICE agents can present a judicial warrant signed by a judge. We know that the vast majority of the time, ICE agents are not presenting that kind of documentation. If they’re presenting any kind of documentation, it tends to be an administrative warrant. And, a lot of times, there isn’t any kind of documentation provided." MAMDANI TELLS ‘THE VIEW’ HE FAVORS ABOLISHING ICE The mayor said earlier that the program is open to any New Yorkers who have children turning 3 or 4 anytime in 2026, adding the program could save New Yorkers tens of thousands of dollars a year "by providing them with free childcare." MAMDANI CALLS ICE DETENTION OF NYC EMPLOYEE ‘ASSAULT ON OUR DEMOCRACY’ Mamdani added, "So, we want to make clear the rights of every New Yorker, that they have in this city. This program is being made available to all, and the fact that we are proud of our values, we are proud of our laws. They keep us safe, and they are also part and parcel of who we are." Mamdani made the statement after a reporter asked what the city would do to keep families safe from ICE agents. The plan to expand free and affordable childcare in New York was unveiled by Mamdani this month in partnership with New York Gov. Kathy Hochul.
    0 Comments 0 Shares 147 Views 0 Reviews
Demur US https://www.demur.us